Grayson Pipher
ENGL 370
Dr. Hague
10 December, 2013
Childe Roland: Dream or Reality?
Robert Browning, author of the ambiguous poem Child Roland to the Dark Tower Came, was often accused of being too obscure. However, William Morris, author of the critical essay Browning's Alleged Carelessness, argues against these accusations, stating, "I assert, fearlessly, that this obscurity is seldom so prominent as to make his poems hard to understand," (502). In most cases, Morris would be right. Most of Browning's works, such as My Last Duchess and Soliloquy of a Spanish Cloister as well as many of his other works, are not too obscure to be able to determine their meaning. Childe Roland, however, is one legitimate example of the obscurity Browning was accused of. Browning admitted that the poem came to him as a dream and after he woke, he finished the poem in one day. He also said that he was inspired by no work outside that of Shakespeare's King Lear; however, many more literary works have been suggested as sources of inspiration. This poem is a sort of dramatic monologue where Childe Roland (childe meaning young warrior before becoming a knight not a child as in a young human being) speaks to the listener (or the reader) about his thoughts and perceptions during his long and arduous quest to find the Dark Tower. Upon reading this poem for the first time, it may seem as if that is all there is to the story; however, that may not be the case. When asked if the poem was indeed meant to have a deeper meaning, Browning answered, "Oh, no, not at all. Understand, I don't repudiate it, either. I only mean I was conscious of no allegorical intention in writing it," (Browning, p.181). By his own admission, Browning was not aware of any double meaning to the poem. However, by delving deeper into the text and the details of each section of the poem, it seems as if it is more analogous than even Browning intended it to be. There are two possible readings for this poem. One, the poem is about a literal quest and the speaker (Childe Roland) is really on a physical journey to the Dark Tower. Two, the journey is not a literal one but a figurative one, taking place in Roland's mind rather than in reality. This essay will examine both of these possibilities.
In order to answer the question, "Is the quest real or in his head?" we must first take into account Roland's state of mind. According to Harold Bloom, author of the critical essay Browning's "Childe Roland": All Things Deformed and Broken, "What happens in in the poem, difficult to determine, perhaps impossible to know with final assurance, depends upon the reader's judgment of Roland, the poem's speaker," (634). If the reader is able to make a judgment on Roland's state of mind, he might be able to decide what is real and what is an illusion. The poem opens with the line, "My first thought was, he lied in every word," (ln. 1). Through this one statement, the reader instantly becomes aware that, for whatever reason, Childe Roland is in a jaded and cynical state of mind. He allows no room for benefit of the doubt and judges the cripples advice as a lie and the cripple himself as malicious. For what else does this cripple have to do, "save to waylay with his lies, ensnare/ All travelers who might find him posted there," (ln. 8-9). Roland believes the cripple's sole purpose is to impede the progress of travelers and laugh while he does it. Roland's state of mind is important in answering our question because we now understand that all accounts Roland makes throughout the poem are seen with a lens of hatred and cynicism.
The first evidence that we encounter suggesting that Roland's quest is a literal one, is in the second stanza where he mentions the cripple lying to other travelers and not just to Roland himself. There is no one else in one's mind, save one's own conscious, so the cripple must be a real being and not just a figment of Roland's imagination, otherwise other travelers would be unable to encounter him. Despite the fact that Roland believe the cripple to be a liar, he fallows the cripple's advice anyway and proceeds down the directed road. Again, his state of mind is obvious when he says, "neither pride/ Nor hope rekindling at the end descried,/ So much as gladness that some end might be," (ln. 16-18). Roland sees as end to his journey, yet it is not a hopeful one. As he continues his journey toward what he hopes is the Dark Tower, he reveals that the day has been a "dreary one at best," and is finally coming to an end. It is at this point where reality seems to set with the sun and his quest becomes more of an illusion or nightmare.
Although there are still instances where evidence points towards reality, his accounts and descriptions become more and more dreamlike as his joinery, and the night, goes on. After a few paces down the directed road, Roland pauses, "to throw backward a last view/ O'er the safe road," but the road had disappeared and he was now surrounded by grey plains as far as the eye could see (ln. 51-52). In reality, if a road that one was traveling were to instantly vanish, it seems the appropriate reaction would be, at the very least, shock and awe. Roland, however, does not seem shocked at all and merely continues on his journey, stating, "I might go on; nought else remained to do," (ln. 54). This is evidence that what is happening to Roland now is happening mainly within his mind. He still may be traveling towards the dark tower, but he has turned within himself and now sees only what he wants to see. The next few stanzas support this statement.
As Roland walks through the plains, he describes the scenery around him. What might be ordinary grasslands with flowers, and trees, and weeds suddenly become, "Such a starved ignoble nature," (ln. 56). The weeds (what many people may revive to be the nuisance of nature), have taken over the plains without check and any plant that dared rise above the rest would have its head chopped off by the jealous weeds. What green grass there was would only be beaten down by "brutes". A person traveling through this area who is not in a hatful state of mind might perceive the land to be overgrown but beautiful. Not Roland though, who sees it only as dead and only curable by "Judgement's fire" (ln. 65). Only then would the land be set free.
Roland also comes upon a horse which he describes as "stiff and blind, his every bone a-stare,/ Stood stupefied" (ln. 75). He refers to the horse as, "the devil's stud" and says, "I never saw a brute i hated so; he must be wicked to deserve such pain," (ln. 78, 83-84). Like his initial thoughts about the cripple at the beginning of the poem, Roland leaves no room for compassion or sympathy for this horse. As soon as he sees it, he hates it more than he has ever hated a beast before. His perception of the old horse on the plains is seen only through a lens of hate and it is hard to discern whether the horse is truly as hatful as he seems. It seems as if Roland truly does come upon this horse as he travels, but his nightmarish state of mind only allows him to see it through a hatful lens, rather than through the lens of a right-minded consciousness. In the next line he states, " I shut my eyes and turn them in my heart," (ln. 85). The perception of the horse could very well be a reflection of his own perception of himself. In his heart he does not feel worthy of success and hates himself for it and he believes he deserves the pain he has encountered on his journey.
Up until this point, Roland's delusions seem to come only from his distorted frame of mind. Now, however, he turns from his head to his heart and begins to remember happy times with his old friends and a battle ensues within Roland between his negative mind and his aching heart. His heart wants to see his friends as they used to be but his head just brings back memories of their downfalls. The battle is short-lived, though, and his mind wins out, "Better this present than a past like that;? back therefore to my darkening path again," (ln.103-104). Roland returns to his journey (what seems to be his literal journey) and has suddenly come across a river, "as unexpected as a serpent comes," (ln. 110). When first reading this part of the poem, it seems as if the river appears out of thin air, eluding to the fact that his journey is not literal at all. However, readers could read the scene differently. While walking, Roland withdraws so much into his thoughts and memories that he does not realize the passage of time or space. The internal battle between his heart and mind distracts him so much that he no longer sees his surroundings. Again, his negative and dark descriptions of the river reminds the reader of Roland's state of mind.
As Roland crosses the river, he feared, "to set (his) foot upon a dead man's cheek/ Each step, or feel the spear (he) thrust to seek," (ln. 122-123). He imagines there might be bodies in the water and, in fear, thrusts his spear below the surface. it is evident that he is imagining these bodies when he says, "It may have been a water-rat I speared/ But, ugh! it sounded like a baby's shriek," (ln. 125-126). In his disillusioned state, he mistakes what could have been a water rat for a human baby, suggesting that he is actually crossing the river, but is still not in a stable state of mind. After he reaches the other side of the river comes a "vain presage" (typically a sign or warning that something bad is going to happen) (ln. 128). Roland soon comes upon the sight of a recent battle and we wonders why the strugglers fought at this place and what they fought over. Although it seems as if the battleground is set in reality, Roland notices there are no footprints leading to or from the site. This might indicate that what Roland is seeing is the battle within himself, rather than a literal battle; perhaps both.
Roland continues on his journey, again negatively describing his surroundings. His mind set has not changed and we as readers must be sure to take this into account. A bird flied over his head, brushing his cap, and he calls the bird "Apollyon's bosom-friend," (ln. 160). Appollyon is sometimes referred to as Abaddon, which means "destroyer" that has wings like a dragon (Browning, p.186). He perceives what could have been just a regular black bird as something out of his own mind. He believes this bird is the guide he has been hoping for because suddenly he realizes he has found the place he has been searching for. As he looks at the Tower, the sun sets and it is once again day. As before, the rising sun is s symbol for the end of his illusion, but in a different way. He has reached his destination, and good or bad, his quest will soon be over. He imagines the surrounding mountains are watching what will happen and they they are calling to him to put an end to the creature (ln. 190-192). He sees those who have failed this quest before him, as if they were there to watch him fail as well. Instead of fearing what seems to be his eminent doom, he puts his slug-horn to his lips and calls, "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower came," signaling the end of his journey (ln. 203-204).
I was captivated by this poem from the first time I read the title. Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came. It still gives me goose bumps when I say or hear it. When I first read this poem, I definitely took it to be a strictly literal quest. I am an avid reader of fiction, so much so that it seems a lot like reality to me at this point, so I was not particular shocked by the illusionistic qualities of this poem. I just passed by them without even noting them and took the poem as reality. Once it was pointed out in class, however, that the quest could in fact be a figurative one, I began to notice these illusionistic details more and more. To me, the poem can be taken both literally and figuratively. Roland's encounter with the cripple, and his judgment thereafter, suggests to me that the quest was real. As I said before, other people would not be able to encounter a man who i a complete figment of Roland's imagination. At the same time, Roland's frame of mind throughout the entirety of the poem suggests that he is not only on a literal quest to find the Dark Tower, but on a figurative journey towards his own death. As the Tower (death) vastly approaches, Roland becomes more and more aware of his eminent doom and the end to his journey, therefore, his outlook on life is extremely bleak and dreary. Therefore, we are only allowed to see the way he preserves his environment, rather than what it actually is. The ambiguity of this poem is what makes it so enrapturing. i am constantly stuck between states of imagination and reality and this poem seems to reflect this part of me perfectly. There is one quote in particular that sums up how I feel about Childe Roland's ambiguity, "See/ Or shut your eyes…It nothing skills (it makes no difference)," (ln. 62-64).
Work Cited
Bloom, Harold. "Browning's 'Childe Roland': All Things Deformed and Broken." Robert Browning's Poetry: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. James F. Loucks and Andrew M. Stauffer. New York. W.W. Norton & Company. 2007. 634-643.
Browning, Robert. "Childe Roland to the Dark Tower Came." Robert Browning's Poetry: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. James F. Loucks and Andrew M. Stauffer. New York. W.W. Norton & Company. 2007. 181-188.
Morris, William. "Browning's Alleged Carelessness." Robert Browning's Poetry: A Norton Critical Edition. Ed. James F. Loucks and Andrew M. Stauffer. New York. W.W. Norton & Company. 2007. 501-502.